Thursday, June 08, 2006

This Post Has No Title (Just Words And A 'Tude)

Just when you think Ann Cun, err, Coulter has said the most inappropriate thing ever, she puts out a new book and draws attention to it with a real whopper.

According to Coulter, several women who lost their husbands in the 9/11 attacks are “witches” who are really enjoying their fame and wealth.

It would never occur to a cretin like Coulter, but I imagine any of those women would give up everything they’ve gained as a result of 9/11 if they could have their loved ones back.

They never chose the spotlight, they were merely unlucky enough to have family members caught in one of the biggest, most infamous tragedies in history.

Naturally, they drew the media’s attention. And, naturally, they earned money from 9/11-related lawsuits, though whatever the amount, it can’t possibly be enough.

It also seems
not to have occurred to Coulter that it's hypocritical of her to criticize anyone profiting from someone else's suffering, as that's what the shrill, tactless hack does herself. Her books and public appearances make her plenty of money, and anyone unfortunate enough to read or hear her words surely suffers nausea and other ill effects.

I suspect Coulter has an issue with the fact that these women so selfishly pushed for the creation of the September 11 Commission, which President Bush and other prominent conservatives opposed it. Damned truth and accountability! Sometimes they are so, as a recent film suggests, inconvenient.

No, those women aren’t witches, they’re widows. Got that, bitch?

25 comments:

Aunty Belle said...

Uh...Bawgs, did'ja hear 'bout Zarquwi(sp?) --more interesting than coulter at the moment.

Pete Bogs said...

AB - I sometimes write these blogs half a day to a day in advance of posting... come back tomorrow and you will be pleased... it's already written...

Anonymous said...

Ann Colter needs to have a hijakdplane flown up her bitch ass yuall, she could get a bullit in the head yappen like that.

Jack K. said...

Hey, bogs, quit hiding. Tell us how you really feel.

I'm with you, dude. Coulter is an interesting personality. She sure hides her harridanship reasonably well, that is, until she opens her mouth or works her PC.

But what do I know?

Bird said...

you go bogs!

i have my own written yet unpublished post on al-Zarqawi. i don't know if mine is postable yet - so I eagerly await yours.

but back to this current post on ms. coulter - here's a link to an old post -NOT by me - oh no!- but by some other blogger about ms. coulter. it's political commentary + erotica. rather intriguing from a writer's perspective - in terms of what the blogger is trying to do.

http://ifuckedanncoulterintheasshard.blogspot.com/

fatty ~ said...

haha go bogs tell em straight.

sorry i havent been around much lately, but keep up the great blog xx

Paddys_Gal said...

Someone needs to snap her in half like a twig.

rusty shakelford said...

Ann was saying that being a victim doesn't give you a political leg up as the democrats have tried to do with the 911 widows. Just by looking at some to the comments I am reminded of her last book "How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must) " Where she points out liberals cant form a reasonable argument, they can only throw stones and insults.
If you disagree with her has it ever occurred to you to form an arguable point and leave the insults on the playground?

Bird said...

rusty - though bogs made supportable, cogent points, it is indeed true that some comments were simply knee-jerk, emotional reactions.

now i'm curious - do you call out such kneejerk, emotional reactions when they come from repubs, or conservatives? how about coulter herself - who is quite adept at name-calling and generalizations?

rusty shakelford said...

if you compare the two, lib/dems far exceed comments made by conservative and the like. I still won't call a sentence pulled from a article that pulled a sentence from a book without giving context a cogent point.

Pete Bogs said...

rusty - what's the context where those statements about the 9/11 widows is acceptable? there is none, for civilized human beings... it was a shitty, shitty thing for her to say... you guys HATE - HATE when people speak out, no matter what's happened to them... the 9/11 widows and Sheehan earned the right to speak loudly in this society... there is no "liberal agenda" of exploiting those tragedies... the fact is, once all those women (Sheehan and the the 9/11 widows) suffered those tragedies they looked at the causes, and then placed blame where it belonged... or in the case of the 9/11 widows, wanted answers... who can blame them? you, apparently!

I've learned something from some other ardent consternatives, and that is whatever the truth is, just say the opposite... the Rovian Machine, which is the voice of the Republicant party, says to distort or make noise and hopefully fool or distract enough people until you win the election... that's what this gay marriage thing was all about in '04, and the same goes now... so the part about throwing stones and insults just doesn't hold water... you guys are starting to believe your own BS, that's the problem... I don't recall any liberal comments that rise to THAT level of distaste or inappropriatenes...

you and AB seem to be telling me who and what to write about, and how, in your comments on this post... I let people insult the crap out of me on here (free speech) but I don't let them tell me how or what to write... Coulter does not deserve any better than I have given her here...

TGIF

Anonymous said...

All Sapiens should be outlawed. Sapiens are not true animals.

Hellpig said...

These witches deserve everything said about them

Viva La Coulter

warvigilent said...

@ hellpig

how is the widows explotation of personal tragedies different from what ann does? the fuss about this alone has gotten her tones of fame and probably even more money.

oh and revX and i are still waiting for your response to some of our posts on the signing statements on post apoc, i still say you cant possibly agree will all of them

rusty shakelford said...

Everyone has the right to speak. AC's point is that loosing a husband on 9/11 or a son in the war does not make you a authority on politics or international disputes. On top of that she was commenting on how liberal organizations where giving a platform to people who if you dared to disagree with you were stuck down for not being a victim yourself.
How can you say their is no liberal agenda. moveon.org. and A.N.S.W.E.R bankrolled Sheehan and helped her organize her protests. The same organizations also gave a platform to the 9/11 widows. Trust me they would not have done that for any victims who were supportive of the President.
What is the Rovian machine? I hate to break this to you but Rove, Bush or anyone else didn't beat the democrats. The democrats gave the voters a baseless message filled with hateful slander and pitiful name calling. For some reason they thought if they mobilized Hollywood it would rally middle America. It didn't work.
Why so surprised about the gay marriage thing. Wasn't that one of Bush's campaign promises. It makes me wonder why liberals are so surprised when Bush carries through with a campaign promise. Considering their own history I guess they are not used to being held to campaign promises.
Liberal comments that rise to THAT level of distaste or inappropriateness. Ward Churchill comes to mind.

Ben said...

Everyone has an agenda.

How you go about yours is A) what defines you and B) who your supporters are going to be.

I for one question Mrs. Coulter for the fact that she seems to think it necessary to express her opinions the way she does.

Ben said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
rusty shakelford said...

No doubt Ann loves to use shock value to rally opposition , get in the news and get people interested in reading her books.

Pete Bogs said...

rusty - Ward Churchill is a radical leftist... liberals are left, but not necessarily leftist... if you look back in my archive you will see I have called Churchill an asshole... I don't want anything to do with him... btw, he ALSO took flack for his comments, and rightfully so...

Hellpig said...

war and rev we all know you are the same person give it a rest already

Bogs flak wasn't enough,loss of job would have been better,but nope still teaching

Pete Bogs said...

hell - when Churchill made his comments, people left and right condemned him... whereas, Coulter's comments have been met with silence or approval on the right...

I think Churchill should be canned, but you can't necessarily do that because someone's an asshole like him...I've got a little Eichmann for him...

unlike some libs, I didn't think it was an issue of academic freedom so much as stupid-ass talking out...

btw, does Coulter have a job we can fire her from?

Hellpig said...

Nope she is self made,and doesn't hold office or a teaching job

So it is hard to make a connection between the 2

She doesn't pander which is why I find her refreshing in an age of Lib PCness

SCREW PC

warviglent said...

@ hellpig

and you call liberals delusional, two different people, im in canada on vancouver island, and rev is in the us. what do you need to prove it?

but really stop doging the issue, i asked you about some of the signing statements on revs site and you never answered

Hellpig said...

Ok what ever you say Rev/War

Well I believe Rev/War is a raging lunatic and suffers from severe mental disorders,I just don't want to give him anything to feed his disorder.he is best left alone with you as your only visitor

warvigilent said...

ok fine ingnore everything that dosent automaticly agree with your veiw of things, dont bother even trying to defend your position. randomly insult anyone who thinks differently and somhow pass that off as a reason that discredits what people have to say and what they ask.

and since when did you care about people with mental disorders you have no problem with us soldiers being forced to fight despite serious psycological prombems, their only treatment is a big bag of over the counter drugs that can become easily addictive.